Comments on: Spooky! http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2002/10/25/spooky Random musings of a Southern geek Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:03:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1-alpha-10188 hourly 1 By: Dougal http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2002/10/25/spooky/comment-page-1#comment-40 Dougal Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:54:28 +0000 //?p=#comment-40 <p> Okay, done :) </p> Okay, done :)

]]> By: Liorean http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2002/10/25/spooky/comment-page-1#comment-39 Liorean Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:07:33 +0000 //?p=#comment-39 Instead of that switcher, I'd recommend you to use my own <a href="http://members.evolt.org/liorean/scripts/themeswitch-t.html">ThemeSwitcher</a>.<br /> The one <a href="http://delete.me.uk/">Paul Sowden</a> wrote doesn't supply all ways of defining alternate stylesheets - mine does. It isn't backwards compatible with 4th gen browsers, though. Instead of that switcher, I’d recommend you to use my own ThemeSwitcher.

The one Paul Sowden wrote doesn’t supply all ways of defining alternate stylesheets - mine does. It isn’t backwards compatible with 4th gen browsers, though.

]]> By: Dougal http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2002/10/25/spooky/comment-page-1#comment-38 Dougal Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:28:30 +0000 //?p=#comment-38 <p> Well, I admit that the HTML has problems (I comment on it right at the top of the source). But yeah, I finally figured out that the real problem is that switcher code I'm using. When I have time to look at it again, I'll try changing to the switcher code from <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/">A List Apart</a>. </p> Well, I admit that the HTML has problems (I comment on it right at the top of the source). But yeah, I finally figured out that the real problem is that switcher code I’m using. When I have time to look at it again, I’ll try changing to the switcher code from A List Apart.

]]> By: Liorean http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2002/10/25/spooky/comment-page-1#comment-37 Liorean Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:00:01 +0000 //?p=#comment-37 Your parsed html stinks, mate. If you cleaned it up (see my answer to your mail to css-d), you'd probably get it both to work in more browsers and be much shorter in code. Vurrently, if I chose the Halloween theme, you put no less than three link tags to the halloween stylesheet in the page, of which one is alternate (default disabled, switchables) and the other two are persistent (always enabled, nonswitchables). In short, your mistake is that you write additional elements instead of modifying the old ones. Your parsed html stinks, mate. If you cleaned it up (see my answer to your mail to css-d), you’d probably get it both to work in more browsers and be much shorter in code.

Vurrently, if I chose the Halloween theme, you put no less than three link tags to the halloween stylesheet in the page, of which one is alternate (default disabled, switchables) and the other two are persistent (always enabled, nonswitchables).

In short, your mistake is that you write additional elements instead of modifying the old ones.

]]>