<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s the little things&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things</link>
	<description>Random musings of a Southern geek</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1-alpha-10188</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Browser-Makers Seek Clickjacking Fix</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things/comment-page-1#comment-164515</link>
		<dc:creator>Browser-Makers Seek Clickjacking Fix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-164515</guid>
		<description>..]Hansen and Grossman were slated to expound on the threat and its implications at last week's OWASP NYC AppSec 2008 Conference. They postponed their conference talk on the vulnerability at the request of Adobe and other "affected vendors," which wanted to wait until a systemic workaround or hotfix could be applied...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..]Hansen and Grossman were slated to expound on the threat and its implications at last week&#8217;s OWASP NYC AppSec 2008 Conference. They postponed their conference talk on the vulnerability at the request of Adobe and other &#8220;affected vendors,&#8221; which wanted to wait until a systemic workaround or hotfix could be applied&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things/comment-page-1#comment-23477</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-23477</guid>
		<description>Just want to say thanks - you have inadvertantly solved a problem for a first-time web-builder..........and saved my sanity in the process!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to say thanks - you have inadvertantly solved a problem for a first-time web-builder&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.and saved my sanity in the process!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Francis</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things/comment-page-1#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-368</guid>
		<description>As the W3 says, "If you set one colour, set them all". Not doing so is irresponsible. If you specify a foreground colour but not a background colour, the idea of CASCADING preferences is lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the W3 says, &#8220;If you set one colour, set them all&#8221;. Not doing so is irresponsible. If you specify a foreground colour but not a background colour, the idea of CASCADING preferences is lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougal</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things/comment-page-1#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-367</guid>
		<description>But as Mike pointed out, if a site is incorporating images that &lt;em&gt;depend&lt;/em&gt; on a particular background color in order to look correct, they should go to the effort to ensure that the intended effect is achieved.

I don't really have a problem with a site not setting a background color in general. It's mostly the cases where it's obvious that they designed around an expectation that wasn't true that bugs me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But as Mike pointed out, if a site is incorporating images that <em>depend</em> on a particular background color in order to look correct, they should go to the effort to ensure that the intended effect is achieved.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have a problem with a site not setting a background color in general. It&#8217;s mostly the cases where it&#8217;s obvious that they designed around an expectation that wasn&#8217;t true that bugs me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things/comment-page-1#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-366</guid>
		<description>But by setting yourself up to be annoyed when people don't set a background color, don't you lose the right tc complain when people don't? Setting a background color for your browser is a sign of &lt;em&gt;user preference&lt;/em&gt; and so a funky background showing up for you is simply a sign of a website respecting your preferences instead of trying to do everything for itself.

If anything more sites should stop using background colors. It'd be better for people like Mike who prefer the lower contrast. It's a lot less work than creating a user stylesheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But by setting yourself up to be annoyed when people don&#8217;t set a background color, don&#8217;t you lose the right tc complain when people don&#8217;t? Setting a background color for your browser is a sign of <em>user preference</em> and so a funky background showing up for you is simply a sign of a website respecting your preferences instead of trying to do everything for itself.</p>
<p>If anything more sites should stop using background colors. It&#8217;d be better for people like Mike who prefer the lower contrast. It&#8217;s a lot less work than creating a user stylesheet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/02/18/its-the-little-things/comment-page-1#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Dougal, on my Windows machines I have the general window background set to light grey. I prefer the lower contrast it gives me.
It also allows me to spot when designers fail to set the default background colour.
I'm also surprised at the number of times I see a page full of images with a mixture of white and transparent backgrounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dougal, on my Windows machines I have the general window background set to light grey. I prefer the lower contrast it gives me.<br />
It also allows me to spot when designers fail to set the default background colour.<br />
I&#8217;m also surprised at the number of times I see a page full of images with a mixture of white and transparent backgrounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
