<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TarPit update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>WordPress, web development, and world domination.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:20:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-162931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-162931</guid>
		<description>Dougal, what happened to the code for your tarpit plugin? I go to http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/08/25/spammer-tar-pit, and then from thereon, to http://dougal.gunters.org/tarpit.txt&#124;phps, but guess what, &quot;Apologies, but we were unable to find what you were looking for. Perhaps searching will help.&quot; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dougal, what happened to the code for your tarpit plugin? I go to <a href="http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/08/25/spammer-tar-pit" rel="nofollow">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/08/25/spammer-tar-pit</a>, and then from thereon, to <a href="http://dougal.gunters.org/tarpit.txt" rel="nofollow">http://dougal.gunters.org/tarpit.txt</a>|phps, but guess what, &#8220;Apologies, but we were unable to find what you were looking for. Perhaps searching will help.&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Acres with a View</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-41061</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Acres with a View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-41061</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TarPit...&lt;/strong&gt;

I don&#8217;t know if it was due to Dougal&#8217;s TarPit plugin, but the comment spammer seems to have gone away for now.  He is not missed.

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TarPit&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if it was due to Dougal&#8217;s TarPit plugin, but the comment spammer seems to have gone away for now.  He is not missed.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiG</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-36491</link>
		<dc:creator>MiG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-36491</guid>
		<description>Hi there, I just downloaded and installed your plugin since I also am a target for the damn crap bots. My Q ( ignorant and stupid as it might be )is how/where do I add the ip&#039;s I want to block? How is it supposed to look like when I add them?

Thanks for your time

/Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I just downloaded and installed your plugin since I also am a target for the damn crap bots. My Q ( ignorant and stupid as it might be )is how/where do I add the ip&#8217;s I want to block? How is it supposed to look like when I add them?</p>
<p>Thanks for your time</p>
<p>/Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un Cielo Provvisorio &#187; Blogware</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-23486</link>
		<dc:creator>Un Cielo Provvisorio &#187; Blogware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-23486</guid>
		<description>[...] Il secondo livello &#232; formato da una versione modificata di SpamTarPit con un meccanismo d&#8217;una astuzia letale: interroga in continuo un rpc che lista gli open proxy e se un ip che ha visitato il blog &quot;Match&quot; ossia combacia, lo aggiunge nella blacklist. Questo ha uno svantaggio, per un po&#8217; si &#232; dentro il blog, ma non dura: entro 5/10 minuti l&#8217;indirizzo ip &#232; out, quindi &#232; anche difficile lasciare un messaggio, dato che la gestione di essi &#232; affidata ad un sistema a doppia validazione ed infine, il terzo livello &#232; Spam Karma II: l&#8217;ideale presidio se per caso le prime due difese siano varcate. Quindi spiacevoli episodi a base di cassamortari e minacce non dovrebbero presentarsi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Il secondo livello &egrave; formato da una versione modificata di SpamTarPit con un meccanismo d&#8217;una astuzia letale: interroga in continuo un rpc che lista gli open proxy e se un ip che ha visitato il blog &quot;Match&quot; ossia combacia, lo aggiunge nella blacklist. Questo ha uno svantaggio, per un po&#8217; si &egrave; dentro il blog, ma non dura: entro 5/10 minuti l&#8217;indirizzo ip &egrave; out, quindi &egrave; anche difficile lasciare un messaggio, dato che la gestione di essi &egrave; affidata ad un sistema a doppia validazione ed infine, il terzo livello &egrave; Spam Karma II: l&#8217;ideale presidio se per caso le prime due difese siano varcate. Quindi spiacevoli episodi a base di cassamortari e minacce non dovrebbero presentarsi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artois</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-20224</link>
		<dc:creator>Artois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-20224</guid>
		<description>and if i want to ban a subnet, like 82.55.x.x-82.59.x.x how i do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and if i want to ban a subnet, like 82.55.x.x-82.59.x.x how i do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Acres with a View</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Acres with a View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Death to All Comment Spammers&lt;/strong&gt;

I am now trying Dougal&#039;s Tarpit plugin to see if I can discourage the video gambling spammer who is flooding my comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Death to All Comment Spammers</strong></p>
<p>I am now trying Dougal&#8217;s Tarpit plugin to see if I can discourage the video gambling spammer who is flooding my comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougal Campbell</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougal Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>However, you would run the risk of blocking innocent bystanders who are in the same subnet.

The tarpit shouldn&#039;t be considered a first line of defense in blocking spam. I find that &lt;em&gt;far&lt;/em&gt; more of the spam targeted at my site is blocked by the normal moderation checks than by my tarpit. The tarpit is mainly useful for cases like I was seeing a week or two ago, when an automated program is sending spam after spam after spam from the same address.

I&#039;ve seen hundreds of spams sent to moderation over the past few days, but only 4 hits have triggered the tarpit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, you would run the risk of blocking innocent bystanders who are in the same subnet.</p>
<p>The tarpit shouldn&#8217;t be considered a first line of defense in blocking spam. I find that <em>far</em> more of the spam targeted at my site is blocked by the normal moderation checks than by my tarpit. The tarpit is mainly useful for cases like I was seeing a week or two ago, when an automated program is sending spam after spam after spam from the same address.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen hundreds of spams sent to moderation over the past few days, but only 4 hits have triggered the tarpit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitten</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>you might be able to clean up the regex with something like:
&lt;code&gt;&quot;/^([0-9]{1,3}\.){2}([0-9]{1,3}\.?){1,2}$&quot;/&lt;/code&gt;
That way, the last quad can be dropped for spammers that are working a subnet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you might be able to clean up the regex with something like:<br />
<code>"/^([0-9]{1,3}\.){2}([0-9]{1,3}\.?){1,2}$"/</code><br />
That way, the last quad can be dropped for spammers that are working a subnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dot-totally.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update/comment-page-1#comment-26175</link>
		<dc:creator>dot-totally.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2004/10/26/tarpit-update#comment-26175</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;away (aint the blogosphere and its wonders great?) and has put my fears to rest. Iâ€™ve reenabled the plugin, and Iâ€™ll just have to stick it to the spammers. Gerrr! Thanks Dougal for your support and your wonderful plugin!  Update 2: Spammer TarPit Version 1.3  has been released, which makes semantic 403 Forbidden errors. Great work, again.  I donâ€™t know if Dougalâ€™s Spammer TarPit is just going slightly overboard on my weblog. Since the 11th of October (that&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->away (aint the blogosphere and its wonders great?) and has put my fears to rest. Iâ€™ve reenabled the plugin, and Iâ€™ll just have to stick it to the spammers. Gerrr! Thanks Dougal for your support and your wonderful plugin!  Update 2: Spammer TarPit Version 1.3  has been released, which makes semantic 403 Forbidden errors. Great work, again.  I donâ€™t know if Dougalâ€™s Spammer TarPit is just going slightly overboard on my weblog. Since the 11th of October (that<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: woody.xen.prgmr.com @ 2010-03-12 01:22:54 by W3 Total Cache -->