http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/09/22/css-powered-slashdot-goes-live?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss WordPress, web development, and world domination. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:42:04 -0400 hourly 1 http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/09/22/css-powered-slashdot-goes-live/comment-page-1#comment-28974 Dougal Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:16:19 +0000 http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=662#comment-28974 Andreas: they explained their reasons for using HTML4 rather than XHTML. The fact that they moved away from table-based layout to CSS is more important in the grand scheme of things. Andreas: they explained their reasons for using HTML4 rather than XHTML. The fact that they moved away from table-based layout to CSS is more important in the grand scheme of things.

]]> http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/09/22/css-powered-slashdot-goes-live/comment-page-1#comment-28969 Elliott Back Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:42:06 +0000 http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=662#comment-28969 I don't think it's a great redesign though. <a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2005/09/23/slashdot-redesigns-whats-the-cost/" rel="nofollow">63% of the download</a> is javascript for ads. That's a lot of ads. I don’t think it’s a great redesign though. 63% of the download is javascript for ads. That’s a lot of ads.

]]> http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/09/22/css-powered-slashdot-goes-live/comment-page-1#comment-28964 Andreas Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:02:38 +0000 http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=662#comment-28964 HTML 4.01... Oh, how lovely it would have been to get XHTML 1.1 instead! HTML 4.01… Oh, how lovely it would have been to get XHTML 1.1 instead!

]]>