<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7 and the demise of CSS hacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks</link>
	<description>Random musings of a Southern geek</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1-10026</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Artem</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-158954</link>
		<dc:creator>Artem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-158954</guid>
		<description>I didn't know about these bugs of IE. That's why I think that there is no better browser than Mozilla is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about these bugs of <acronym title='Internet Explorer'><span class='caps'>IE</span></acronym>. That&#8217;s why I think that there is no better browser than Mozilla is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n008</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-158563</link>
		<dc:creator>n008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-158563</guid>
		<description>This really sucks.  Contrary to what MS seems to think, they've merely created MORE need for hacks, since IE7 doesn't display standards compliant CSS correctly EITHER, but also kills off many of the hacks and work arounds of IE6 and below.  Way to go MS on completely dropping the ball, even AFTER being nearly a decade late to the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really sucks.  Contrary to what MS seems to think, they&#8217;ve merely created MORE need for hacks, since <acronym title='Internet Explorer 7'><span class='caps'>IE7</span></acronym> doesn&#8217;t display standards compliant <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym> correctly EITHER, but also kills off many of the hacks and work arounds of <acronym title='Internet Explorer 6'><span class='caps'>IE6</span></acronym> and below.  Way to go MS on completely dropping the ball, even AFTER being nearly a decade late to the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-157953</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-157953</guid>
		<description>well there we go again - we have to effectively build three sites for every one  we produce as ie6 doesn't respond in the same way as ie7 which again is different from the Mozilla browsers - ultimately costing more time to build a website than ever! and as for the end of hacks - they are more varied and complicated than any i have had to use before - so i agree thanks a bunch mr richest man in the worlD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well there we go again - we have to effectively build three sites for every one  we produce as ie6 doesn&#8217;t respond in the same way as ie7 which again is different from the Mozilla browsers - ultimately costing more time to build a website than ever! and as for the end of hacks - they are more varied and complicated than any i have had to use before - so i agree thanks a bunch mr richest man in the worlD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britney</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-42324</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-42324</guid>
		<description>Thansk for the link Nick always fun learning more Hacks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thansk for the link Nick always fun learning more Hacks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Gagne</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-37962</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-37962</guid>
		<description>There is a hack that works for all versions of internet explorer, including IE7. You can find it here:
&lt;a title="IE7 CSS Hack" href="http://www.ibloomstudios.com/article7/" rel="nofollow"&gt;IE7 CSS Hack&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a hack that works for all versions of internet explorer, including <acronym title='Internet Explorer 7'><span class='caps'>IE7</span></acronym>. You can find it here:<br />
<a title="IE7 CSS Hack" href="http://www.ibloomstudios.com/article7/" ><acronym title='Internet Explorer 7'><span class='caps'>IE7</span></acronym> <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym> Hack</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Bowers</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-34121</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-34121</guid>
		<description>I agree Craig that it will indeeed create a new breed or another level of creating great look css. Great read found it on the webstandards site before getting here and was glad to see they added it to there buzz worthy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Craig that it will indeeed create a new breed or another level of creating great look css. Great read found it on the webstandards site before getting here and was glad to see they added it to there buzz worthy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syntetica CTRL+C &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pandora&#8217;s Box (Model) of CSS Hacks And Other Good Intentions</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-33218</link>
		<dc:creator>Syntetica CTRL+C &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pandora&#8217;s Box (Model) of CSS Hacks And Other Good Intentions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-33218</guid>
		<description>[...] Implicit in the story above are a set of design principles which I kept in mind when I first set about creating CSS hacks, and which I really should have noted at the time. Given all the hand-wringing about CSS hacks incited by my colleague Markus Mielke, it&#8217;s about time I documented these principles. More on the hang-wringing later. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Implicit in the story above are a set of design principles which I kept in mind when I first set about creating <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym> hacks, and which I really should have noted at the time. Given all the hand-wringing about <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym> hacks incited by my colleague Markus Mielke, it&#8217;s about time I documented these principles. More on the hang-wringing later. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Standards Project BUZZ</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-33207</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Standards Project BUZZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-33207</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pandora's Box (Model) of CSS Hacks And Other Good Intentions&lt;/strong&gt;

This Thanksgiving I've decided it's about time that I provided some more background and analysis on one of the things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pandora&#8217;s Box (Model) of <acronym title='Cascading Style Sheets'><span class='caps'>CSS</span></acronym> Hacks And Other Good Intentions</strong></p>
<p>This Thanksgiving I&#8217;ve decided it&#8217;s about time that I provided some more background and analysis on one of the things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-31044</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-31044</guid>
		<description>What I can't believe this... MS sucks. It's simple I can't believe there's even a debate. Poor security, poor standards implementation. How hard can it be? Follow the guidelines set forth. All of the browsers do something out of wack but, MS IE just takes the cake. 

Why don't developers just take a stand and not change, not switch. Make MS change, they have the money and resources to get it together. Why have thousands of web sites and developers change instead of 1 company with 1 application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I can&#8217;t believe this&#8230; MS sucks. It&#8217;s simple I can&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s even a debate. Poor security, poor standards implementation. How hard can it be? Follow the guidelines set forth. All of the browsers do something out of wack but, MS <acronym title='Internet Explorer'><span class='caps'>IE</span></acronym> just takes the cake. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t developers just take a stand and not change, not switch. Make MS change, they have the money and resources to get it together. Why have thousands of web sites and developers change instead of 1 company with 1 application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: praetorian</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/10/13/css-hacks/comment-page-1#comment-30839</link>
		<dc:creator>praetorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/?p=672#comment-30839</guid>
		<description>"Much-improved." I have a better idea. How about just adhering to the standards? Nice try, Mr. Gates. Personally, I don't care what MS intends to do - the world is already passing it by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Much-improved.&#8221; I have a better idea. How about just adhering to the standards? Nice try, Mr. Gates. Personally, I don&#8217;t care what MS intends to do - the world is already passing it by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
