<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New features in WordPress 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/</link>
	<description>WordPress, web development, and world domination.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:29:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19719</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Gingrich</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-37832</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gingrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-37832</guid>
		<description>Being new to Wordpress, having started with 1.5 in November, I must say that I LOVE the 2.0 release. It&#039;s hard to quantify it exactly in technical terms, but I&#039;m finding it to be faster and the admin interface much nicer. Although I&#039;m ok with HTML hand coding for entries, I much prefer the WYSIWIG...I&#039;m doing things like bullets that I&#039;d been avoiding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being new to WordPress, having started with 1.5 in November, I must say that I LOVE the 2.0 release. It&#8217;s hard to quantify it exactly in technical terms, but I&#8217;m finding it to be faster and the admin interface much nicer. Although I&#8217;m ok with <acronym title='HyperText Markup Language'><span class='caps'>HTML</span></acronym> hand coding for entries, I much prefer the WYSIWIG&#8230;I&#8217;m doing things like bullets that I&#8217;d been avoiding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogRank</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-35989</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-35989</guid>
		<description>WordPress 1.5 is just fine, thank you. I&#039;m running 2.0 on a couple of small sites and it&#039;s working fine, but I just like the feel and the simplicity of 1.5 and don&#039;t feel the need to upgrade just yet on my main site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress 1.5 is just fine, thank you. I&#8217;m running 2.0 on a couple of small sites and it&#8217;s working fine, but I just like the feel and the simplicity of 1.5 and don&#8217;t feel the need to upgrade just yet on my main site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Ritter &#187; WordPress 2.0: To Upgrade or Not?</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-35779</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Ritter &#187; WordPress 2.0: To Upgrade or Not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-35779</guid>
		<description>[...] So, naturally I wonder if it&#8217;s all worth it. I&#8217;ve read all the hype, but nothing really sticks to me like gum on the backseat of my pants in a movie theater - until I read this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, naturally I wonder if it&#8217;s all worth it. I&#8217;ve read all the hype, but nothing really sticks to me like gum on the backseat of my pants in a movie theater &#8211; until I read this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBisch</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-35432</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-35432</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WordPress 2.0.... Who Cares?&lt;/strong&gt;

The software I use for this blog is called WordPress… for those of you who are familiar with WordPress, you probably know that version 2.0 came out not too long ago. I haven’t upgraded to 2.0 yet, and the other day Owen wanted to know why.

I haven’t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WordPress 2.0&#8230;. Who Cares?</strong></p>
<p>The software I use for this blog is called WordPress… for those of you who are familiar with WordPress, you probably know that version 2.0 came out not too long ago. I haven’t upgraded to 2.0 yet, and the other day Owen wanted to know why.</p>
<p>I haven’t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenspirit</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-35213</link>
		<dc:creator>xenspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-35213</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had some trouble with the wysiwyg html editor inserting things that aren&#039;t supposed to be there. Overall though I think it is fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had some trouble with the wysiwyg html editor inserting things that aren&#8217;t supposed to be there. Overall though I think it is fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ByteDreams</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-35195</link>
		<dc:creator>ByteDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-35195</guid>
		<description>hmm, guess the WYSIWYG feature is for newbies like me.  Fantastico makes it easy for a newbie to install WP, but newbies want to make their own templates and even for a seasoned newbie like myself that for the most part can figure things out, the code can be a little bit stressful.  Blogs are supposed to be fun, and not just for the code-enlightened few out there anymore -- whether for business or pleasure, more non-technical folks want blogs.  I don&#039;t think this means WordPress has to dummy itself up, but without seeing it, I imagine this is what that feature is for, and I actually look forward to it.

Typepad has some stuff added to Golive, will Wordpress be doing something like this? I think that may be cool, as I use DW MX 2004. Or has it already come out with a DW or Golive extension I just haven&#039;t seen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, guess the <acronym title='What You See Is What You Get'><span class='caps'>WYSIWYG</span></acronym> feature is for newbies like me.  Fantastico makes it easy for a newbie to install <acronym title='WordPress'><span class='caps'>WP</span></acronym>, but newbies want to make their own templates and even for a seasoned newbie like myself that for the most part can figure things out, the code can be a little bit stressful.  Blogs are supposed to be fun, and not just for the code-enlightened few out there anymore &#8212; whether for business or pleasure, more non-technical folks want blogs.  I don&#8217;t think this means WordPress has to dummy itself up, but without seeing it, I imagine this is what that feature is for, and I actually look forward to it.</p>
<p>Typepad has some stuff added to Golive, will WordPress be doing something like this? I think that may be cool, as I use DW MX 2004. Or has it already come out with a DW or Golive extension I just haven&#8217;t seen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7ghz.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; So Long 1.5x Hello 2.0</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-35159</link>
		<dc:creator>7ghz.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; So Long 1.5x Hello 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-35159</guid>
		<description>[...] Geek Ramblings New Features in Wordpress 2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geek Ramblings New Features in WordPress 2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keis-Hansen.DK &#187; Ny Wordpress 2.0 ude</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-35071</link>
		<dc:creator>Keis-Hansen.DK &#187; Ny Wordpress 2.0 ude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-35071</guid>
		<description>[...] Hvad er nyt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hvad er nyt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-34986</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-34986</guid>
		<description>I have to agree that 2.0 is a little low on fixing basic limitations. I do like the new layout of the admin section, nicer to work with. The new privileges model will be much better than the old one, once it&#039;s supported by anything.

I don&#039;t use the WYSIWYG editor either but it&#039;ll help a lot of non-technical users. Still, I hope that you guys will actually improve wordpress itself for the next release instead of doing so much cosmetics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that 2.0 is a little low on fixing basic limitations. I do like the new layout of the admin section, nicer to work with. The new privileges model will be much better than the old one, once it&#8217;s supported by anything.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use the <acronym title='What You See Is What You Get'><span class='caps'>WYSIWYG</span></acronym> editor either but it&#8217;ll help a lot of non-technical users. Still, I hope that you guys will actually improve wordpress itself for the next release instead of doing so much cosmetics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24fc</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20/#comment-34950</link>
		<dc:creator>24fc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2005/12/24/new-features-in-wordpress-20#comment-34950</guid>
		<description>What in the world do we need a WYSIWYG editor for? Are HTML tags really that difficult to understand, and is it that impossible to push the save button and see what the post looks like while setting it to private? The editor is, imo, pointless and unnecessary. Those who need it to help them with difficult tasks cannot actually do anything difficult in it, such as define custom div tags etc, because it hides them and has no facility for doing anything difficult, and those of us with the ability to do that have to turn it off to write some html in the back.

Plus it makes the write page unnecessarily slow and bandwidth intensive. 

Add to that the fact that it isn&#039;t truly WYSIWYG, but just &quot;kind of&quot; WYSIWYG, and I see no reason to have included it. 

Meanwhile, if I want to move a group of posts from one category to another, I need a plug in. It seems WP development is misprioritizing fluff and leaving out solid functions that actually help me do work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the world do we need a <acronym title='What You See Is What You Get'><span class='caps'>WYSIWYG</span></acronym> editor for? Are <acronym title='HyperText Markup Language'><span class='caps'>HTML</span></acronym> tags really that difficult to understand, and is it that impossible to push the save button and see what the post looks like while setting it to private? The editor is, imo, pointless and unnecessary. Those who need it to help them with difficult tasks cannot actually do anything difficult in it, such as define custom div tags etc, because it hides them and has no facility for doing anything difficult, and those of us with the ability to do that have to turn it off to write some html in the back.</p>
<p>Plus it makes the write page unnecessarily slow and bandwidth intensive. </p>
<p>Add to that the fact that it isn&#8217;t truly <acronym title='What You See Is What You Get'><span class='caps'>WYSIWYG</span></acronym>, but just &#8220;kind of&#8221; <acronym title='What You See Is What You Get'><span class='caps'>WYSIWYG</span></acronym>, and I see no reason to have included it. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, if I want to move a group of posts from one category to another, I need a plug in. It seems <acronym title='WordPress'><span class='caps'>WP</span></acronym> development is misprioritizing fluff and leaving out solid functions that actually help me do work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: dougal.gunters.org @ 2012-02-12 00:21:43 by W3 Total Cache -->
