<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.2 Release Candidate 1 Now Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1</link>
	<description>Random musings of a Southern geek</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2-beta</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WordPress 2.1 fan</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158413</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress 2.1 fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 16:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158413</guid>
		<description>Dougal, well, I guess that is the disadvantage of not been a professional WP coder, like myself. I make the theme, it works, then I figure it does not even displaying properly in IE (as I work in FF) and when I tried to upgrade using my test blog, the widgets and some other fancy enhancements ended up been a lil` screwed up. Not to you have mentioned it,  I don't know if it interrupts or interfering with the API key. I'd have to check as I have no clue..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dougal, well, I guess that is the disadvantage of not been a professional WP coder, like myself. I make the theme, it works, then I figure it does not even displaying properly in <acronym title='Internet Explorer'><span class='caps'>IE</span></acronym> (as I work in FF) and when I tried to upgrade using my test blog, the widgets and some other fancy enhancements ended up been a lil` screwed up. Not to you have mentioned it,  I don&#8217;t know if it interrupts or interfering with the <acronym title='Application Interface'><span class='caps'>API</span></acronym> key. I&#8217;d have to check as I have no clue..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geek ramblings :: WordPress 2.2 Release Candidate 2 Now Available</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158313</link>
		<dc:creator>geek ramblings :: WordPress 2.2 Release Candidate 2 Now Available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158313</guid>
		<description>[...] Skip navigation About This SiteArchivesDonateContactWeight GoalThe Car Tag Saga         &#171; WordPress 2.2 Release Candidate 1 Now Available [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Skip navigation About This SiteArchivesDonateContactWeight GoalThe Car Tag Saga         &laquo; WordPress 2.2 Release Candidate 1 Now Available [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougal</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158312</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158312</guid>
		<description>Arun: There are no real changes to the category system in the 2.2 release. The 2.3 release, will have a major overhaul to the category system to accomodate tags and other alternate taxonomies.

WordPress 2.1 Fan: Normally, there shouldn't be any theme issues with upgrades to core, unless you are bypassing the API in some way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arun: There are no real changes to the category system in the 2.2 release. The 2.3 release, will have a major overhaul to the category system to accomodate tags and other alternate taxonomies.</p>
<p>WordPress 2.1 Fan: Normally, there shouldn&#8217;t be any theme issues with upgrades to core, unless you are bypassing the <acronym title='Application Interface'><span class='caps'>API</span></acronym> in some way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress 2.1 fan</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158305</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress 2.1 fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 17:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158305</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I think WP upgrade their versions far too fast, I still didn't manage to make the upgrade to 2.1 version and bah, 2.2 is on the horizon. Also, as I make my own WordPress theme, it's a pain sometimes as some themes or elements end up incompetible with the newer version and this means I gotta somehow test them all with the new release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I think WP upgrade their versions far too fast, I still didn&#8217;t manage to make the upgrade to 2.1 version and bah, 2.2 is on the horizon. Also, as I make my own WordPress theme, it&#8217;s a pain sometimes as some themes or elements end up incompetible with the newer version and this means I gotta somehow test them all with the new release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for 5/13/07 [my NetNewsWire tabs]</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158304</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for 5/13/07 [my NetNewsWire tabs]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 17:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158304</guid>
		<description>[...] geek ramblings :: WordPress 2.2 Release Candidate 1 Now Available &#8212; Willing to take a walk on the wild side? &#8220;Changes, and such.&#8221;:http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] geek ramblings :: WordPress 2.2 Release Candidate 1 Now Available &#8212; Willing to take a walk on the wild side? &#8220;Changes, and such.&#8221;:http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158301</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 08:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158301</guid>
		<description>Are post and link categories separated in this version? &lt;em&gt;Please&lt;/em&gt; say yes.. Please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are post and link categories separated in this version? <em>Please</em> say yes.. Please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougal</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158278</guid>
		<description>&lt;q&gt;Future posts still do not work&lt;/q&gt;

If you find a bug, old or new, please report it on the &lt;a href="http://trac.wordpress.org/"&gt;WordPress Trac site&lt;/a&gt;, and also to the wp-testers mailing list. Include as many details as you can, including the steps needed to reproduce the problem, if possible.

Oh, and I just tried a future post, and it worked just fine for me. Make sure that your timezone offset is set correctly in Options/General. Depending on what you're doing, that could have an effect.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><q>Future posts still do not work</q></p>
<p>If you find a bug, old or new, please report it on the <a href="http://trac.wordpress.org/">WordPress Trac site</a>, and also to the wp-testers mailing list. Include as many details as you can, including the steps needed to reproduce the problem, if possible.</p>
<p>Oh, and I just tried a future post, and it worked just fine for me. Make sure that your timezone offset is set correctly in Options/General. Depending on what you&#8217;re doing, that could have an effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158271</guid>
		<description>@Dougal

Gracias. I shall sw directly.

@Radek

Well, poop. I was really hoping that would get ironed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dougal</p>
<p>Gracias. I shall sw directly.</p>
<p>@Radek</p>
<p>Well, poop. I was really hoping that would get ironed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radek</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158265</link>
		<dc:creator>Radek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158265</guid>
		<description>Future posts still do not work :-((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Future posts still do not work :-((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougal</title>
		<link>http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158257</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 21:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougal.gunters.org/blog/2007/05/09/wordpress-22-rc1#comment-158257</guid>
		<description>We only tag full releases. Ongoing development happens in branches (or in trunk). So what you're looking for is:

  http://svn.automattic.com/wordpress/branches/2.2

Bugfixes will continue to be committed in there. When the code is considered release-worthy, it will be copied over to '.../tags/2.2', which will always be a snapshot of the code at the time of official release. But any subsequent patches will continue to go under '.../branches/2.2', and if necessary, release snapshots would be made as '.../tags/2.2.1', etc.

Normally, the current RC code wouldn't be in a branch, it would just be the trunk. But with the decision to back out tags until 2.3, we currently have an abnormal situation where there is active development along two branches (2.2 and trunk, AKA 2.3).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We only tag full releases. Ongoing development happens in branches (or in trunk). So what you&#8217;re looking for is:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://svn.automattic.com/wordpress/branches/2.2" >http://svn.automattic.com/wordpress/branches/2.2</a></p>
<p>Bugfixes will continue to be committed in there. When the code is considered release-worthy, it will be copied over to &#8216;&#8230;/tags/2.2&#8242;, which will always be a snapshot of the code at the time of official release. But any subsequent patches will continue to go under &#8216;&#8230;/branches/2.2&#8242;, and if necessary, release snapshots would be made as &#8216;&#8230;/tags/2.2.1&#8242;, etc.</p>
<p>Normally, the current RC code wouldn&#8217;t be in a branch, it would just be the trunk. But with the decision to back out tags until 2.3, we currently have an abnormal situation where there is active development along two branches (2.2 and trunk, AKA 2.3).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
