11 Comments

  1. Geof F. Morris gfmorris.net
    Posted October 16, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    Same here … so how are you re-shuffling things? Lots of SQL-fu, or is there a plugin out there that I’m missing?

  2. Dougal dougal.gunters.org
    Posted October 16, 2007 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    I started with the “Categories to Tags Converter” importer (Manage/Import).

    I also have a subset of posts that have ‘keywords’ post-meta data. I used the “Jerome’s Keywords” importer to convert those, but first I disabled the line in the importer that deletes the post-meta values after import. I wanted to keep that, despite the redundancy.

    No SQL-fu required! Though, at some point, I might go in and convert all my tags to lowercase, just because I prefer them that way.

  3. Patrick Havens litwc.com
    Posted October 16, 2007 at 5:25 pm | Permalink

    Hmmm got an error the first time I saw the site… but no other funkiness.

    I guess I can delete the email, and also tell you personally thanks for the help on gl_tail.

  4. Ingrid thegirlinthecafe.com
    Posted October 16, 2007 at 6:20 pm | Permalink

    I have never thought about cross referencing tags between Flickr and Wordpress, but that is a brilliant idea!

  5. Eats Wombats wombatdiet.net
    Posted October 16, 2007 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    I don’t get the reference to converting tags to lower case. WP2.3 seems to insist on it, unless the tag was previously the name of a category–if I’m not mistaken. Who said consistency was the hobgoblin of foolish minds?

    Your Pepys Project link is dead. There’s a link on my blogroll to an ongoing Pepys project.

  6. Tom J. Kiehn digenis.org
    Posted October 17, 2007 at 5:29 am | Permalink

    I also started using WP categories as more of a tagging function a few years ago. Now I have tens of dozens of tags, some very closely related to each other. Once I get around to upgrading my WP, I might have to revisit this post. Let us know if you have any other tips or trouble in the process, please.

  7. Jen / domestika domestikgoddess.com
    Posted October 17, 2007 at 7:05 am | Permalink

    Great idea, to cross-reference tags: I do a similar thing with Gmail labels (upper case labels for blog categories, lower-case labels for tags) so I’m kicking myself for not thinking to expand the system to del.icio.us and such. Thanks for the tip!

  8. Chess Teaching chessteacher.110mb.com
    Posted October 17, 2007 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    I also have used the WordPress category system like a tagging system, but some of the categories have to stay categories while some of them have to be converted to tags. I hesitate to start converting because of the amount of work, but some of the suggestions here may be very helpfull

  9. Alex Holsgrove blind-summit.co.uk
    Posted October 17, 2007 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    I thought you were adjusting your CSS? I think one of the most basic things is to know that you can only have one element per unique id. You seem to use id=”links” all over the place. Try validating to XHTML1.0 strict. I have been tearing wordpress and some themes apart and validating them completely. They work over IE6 / IE7 and firefox. I am also confident that the site will look fine in Opera and also on the mac. I’m happy to help if you need any advice. Thanks

  10. redwall_hp webmaster-source.com
    Posted October 17, 2007 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    How is it a new theme then? Wouldn’t it be the same thing v1.1?

  11. Dougal dougal.gunters.org
    Posted October 18, 2007 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Chess Guru: The importer can selectively convert just some of you categories to tags — you pick and choose which ones to convert, and which ones to leave as categories. That’s what I did.

    Alex: I hadn’t noticed the duplicate ‘link’ ids. Those are generated by the standard Links widget. I’ll make a patch and file a bug on that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

    redwall: Previously, I was using Sandbox 0.6, plus some custom hacks I had made to the theme files. I’ve upgraded to Sandbox 1.0, and replaced my hacks with more standard API usage from my local plugins. The CSS only required a few minor tweaks here and there to adjust for some changes to the underlying HTML structure generated by the Sandbox theme. Does it justify calling my new theme “2.0″? Who cares? I’m eventually going to redo the whole site anyways.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

  • Subscribe

  • Follow Me

    Twitter  Facebook  Flickr  Last.fm  LinkedIn  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Delicious  
    • icon
  • Referrals

    Sign up for Text Link Ads and earn money from your blog.
  • Lifestream

    • Anybody know where I can get an apt for PHP > 5.2.6 for Ubuntu Jaunty (without upgrading to Karmic?) [dougal]
      1h ago via Twitter
    • Crap. A bug in the Unbuntu 9.04 version of PHP has caused me to waste several hours. I hate when that happens. [dougal]
      1h ago via Twitter
    • Every time the @BaskinRobbins "Ice Cream and Cake" commercial comes on, our kids all break into spontaneous song and dance. Hilarious! [dougal]
      19h ago via Twitter
    • Today for me will be all about XML. I'm trying to maintain a positive attitude about that :) [dougal]
      1d ago via Twitter
    • @ryanolson I'll be working on a new version of the Fancybox Gallery plugin soon, with user-configurable options. [dougal]
      1d ago via Twitter