Technorati redesign

Thanks to the efforts of Tantek: a new Technorati design. In the words of Scotty, “It’s…it’s… It’s green!”

By rewriting the vast majority of the markup (both from the old Technorati site, and the mockups from AP), I was able to simultaneously reduce the size of the HTML, while significantly increasing its semantic fidelity.

The result: I cut the size of Technorati’s home page in half, made it Valid XHTML, with a style sheet that is Valid CSS. (Nevermind that the W3C CSS Validator is buggy in that it incorrectly labels the page as invalid due to the validator’s failure to parse the perfectly valid media attribute value screen,projection).

However, they seem to be having some backend problems at the moment. I can’t get it to show me my link cosmos unless I manually remove the “rank” parameter from the querystring.

(via photomatt)

Stumble It!
Technorati redesign

Related posts:

  1. Real World CSS
    " For anyone who is still mired in the HTML Tag Soup of old-style web page design, the question, “Why should I switch to using..."
  2. Time for Redesign
    " I’ve been threatening to do it for years, but I think it’s really time — time to redesign this site, for real. If what..."
  3. More on microformats
    " There is now a dedicated site for information about microformats: microformats.org I’m working on a movie review using the hReview format. I’m hoping that..."
  4. Crash!
    " This server was down for about 40 minutes today, due to a power failure at my hosting location. The power failure was caused, ironically..."
  5. More validation than you can shake a stick at
    " I spent a few minutes digging through my HTML and my blogging software source, and this page now validates: It still looks like poo..."
This entry was posted in Web Design and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

3 Comments

  1. Dougal Campbell dougal.gunters.org
    Posted July 28, 2004 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    It looks like the problems I experienced yesterday have been cleared up. I sent them an email about it, but I don’t know if my report had anything to do with the fixes or not. I’m just glad to see it working better :)

  2. Tantek tantek.com
    Posted July 29, 2004 at 5:11 am | Permalink

    Dougal,

    Thanks for the kind words and *especially* the critical feedback. You’re totally right, we’ve had some issues, and we’ve worked to resolve a bunch of them. Keep letting us know how we’re doing, good or bad (especially if it is bad).

    Regards,

    Tantek

  3. Francesco Cepolina cepolina.com
    Posted October 26, 2004 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Each time I use an HTML validator, it finds different errors inside my pages!!! Here there is a list of famous validators; Dr. Watson, v5.05, The W3C Markup Validation Service and HTML Tidy Library Project. Last program is specially interesting because it operates the cleaning procedure autonomously.

One Trackback

  1. By Tantek's Thoughts on July 27, 2004 at 10:05 pm

    Comments Biz Stone Matthew Mullenweg Philipp Lenssen mediaTIC Dougal Campbell Thomas Arie Setiawan

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

  • Subscribe

  • Follow Me

    Twitter  Facebook  Flickr  Last.fm  LinkedIn  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Delicious  
    • icon
  • Referrals

    Sign up for Text Link Ads and earn money from your blog.
  • Lifestream